The Six Levels Of The American Government.

We have six levels of government in America: The Bilderberg Society, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Committee of 300 and such other groups are on Level A where all decisions are made. These people have been around for a very long time. Most of the ancestors of the inner circle made their money from the slave trade, colonial exploitation and from the British East India company and opium. The Bilderberg Society has only been meeting since 1954. It has a Steering Committee which decides the agenda for their annual meetings. This year the meeting will be in Virginia. The three founders were Sir Evelyn De Rothschild, David Rockefeller and Prince Bernmhard of the immensely wealthy Dutch royal family. The interests of English, Spanish and other royal families are represented in the Steering Committee, but they never attend. Barry Chamish, who is so Jewish that the Israeli government ran him out of Israel, noticed that western diplomats were making stops in their shuttle diplomacy to see the King of Spain. It seems that he represents the chivalric orders in the Freemasons, who believe they have a prior and more valid claim to Jerusalem than do either the Israelis or the Palestinians. The European nobility is also called the "Black Nobility" and are on the inside of the decision making of the inner circles. They are also called the Black Nobility, because their deeds are evil, and because they often wore the black robes of the Catholic church. The Rothschild family has been bankers to the Vatican since 1827. Many of the Black Nobility can trace their ancestry back to the Byzantine Emperor Leo the Khazar, whose mother was Princess Irene of the Khazars. Others can trace their family fortunes back to Venice: Venice had a gold-based currency that collapsed due to fractional reserve banking. If a man came by and deposited ten gold coins, you could give him a receipt, which would be treated as a 'gold equivalent' by merchants. The bankers soon issued far too many paper gold certificates. The whole scheme collapsed in 1348, but the perpetrators were allowed to flee. Most settled in Holland and took their fractional reserve banking plans with them!!   

John M. Broder: New Proposal on Fracking Gives Ground to Industry!

The Obama administration on Friday issued a proposed rule governing hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas on public lands, that will for the first time require disclosure of the chemicals used in the process. But in a significant concession to the oil industry, companies will have to reveal the composition of fluids only after they have completed drilling, a sharp change from the government's original proposal, which would have required disclosure of the chemicals 30 days before a well could be started. The pullback on the rule followed a series of meetings at the White House after the original regulation was proposed in February. Lobbyists representing oil industry trade associations and individual major producers like Exxon-Mobil, XTO Energy, Apache, Samson Resources and Anadarko Petroleum, met with officials of the Office of Management and Budget, who reworked the rule to address industry concerns about overlapping state regulations and the cost of compliance. Production of domestic oil and natural gas has surged in recent years, as hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have opened new fields and allowed renewed production from formations that had seemed depleted. President Obama has strongly endorsed the new production as a boon to the economy and energy security, and the president, under intense criticism of his energy policies from Republicans and oil industry officials as he faces a re-election contest, has recently taken steps to ease government regulation of oil operations. In its original proposal oil companies disclose the chemicals they intend to use in drilling before starting a well, the Interior Department was seeking to address the concerns of landowners and communities about potential pollution of groundwater. 

Henry Shivley: Obama Signs Executive Order Declaring International Law!

On May 1, 2012, "our Glorious Leader", President Barack Obama, AKA Barry the Rat, signed yet another Executive Order, Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation. This 'dictate' is designed to standardize regulations between the United States and its "so-called" trading partners. What is a regulation? A law! So what is actually being attempted here is a standardization of international law. It is an absolute violation of the Constitution for the United States to legislate our law outside of our borders. Considering the many international security agreements the traitors occupying our highest seats of power have entered into, this latest "executive order" can absolutely be used to institute gun confiscation, without any consent by our Congress or our Judicial. Once these foreign laws are brought to the United States under the various security agreements, foreign troops will be brought in to enforce the foreign laws upon the people of the United States. So look at what we have now: The Patriot Act, which allows unlimited spying on the American people by the government. The National Defense Authorization Act with Sections 1021 and 1022 for the military arrests and indefinite detention of American nationals without any due process of the law. HR 347 Trespass Law for the implementation of Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act upon any citizen who dares to speak out against the insurgency. Executive Order National Defense Resources Preparedness Act, which allows the "dictator" to confiscate every resource of the United States, including "we the people as conscripts to be put in servitude to the insurgency. This is exactly what the Bolsheviks did to the Russian people in 1917. Now we have this new "executive" order for the implementation of laws not legislated by our Congress!!! 

Kevin Rafferty: Inviting Economic Suicide?

The International Monetary Fund has just reported that India has overtaken Japan as the world's third biggest economy in purchasing power parity (PPP), the measure of the amount of money needed to purchase the same goods and services. Now it is at least semi-official: Japan's economy is on the skids. A report just released by a yjink tank of the Nipppn Keidanren, the country's most powerful business organization, says that by 2050, Japan will no longer be a developed country, predicting years of negative growth from 2030 onward. "Unless something is done, we are afraid that Japan will fall out of the league of advanced nations and again become a tiny country in the Far East," says the report in Japanese by the 21st Century Public Policy Institute (21st CPPI), the research institute of Keidanren. The report should serve as a wake-up call to Japan's economic and political establishment to take radical remedial reforms. The worry must be that there are few people inside Japan Inc, who have a clue about how to remedy the situation, still less the necessary political clout. The 21st CPPI predicts that in the best-case scenario, Japan's gross domestic product in 2050 will only be one-sixth of China's and one third of India's, as the country struggles to stay ahead of Brazil as the world's fourth biggest economy. If Japan does not take remedial measures, it will drop to ninth place in the world, behind France and barely ahead of Indonesia. According to the IMF, the European Union has the largest GDP, worth $15.8 trillion, followed by the United States with $15 trillion. China with $11.3 trillion, and India now narrowly ahead of Japan, with $4.44 trillion. In per capita terms, of course, the US and Japan are far ahead of the two Asian giants: US (sixth in the world) $48,387, Japan (24th), $34,740, China (92nd), $8,382, India (129th), $3,694 (all in PPP).     

Prof. John Kozy: A World of Thieving Financiers!

At times, something seemingly insignificant, when thought about deeply, reveals truths that the establishment seeks to keep hidden, the most important of which is the real purpose of a nation's existence. Most Americans, for instance, believe that America exists for their benefit, and they expect the nation's institutions to serve their needs. But astute observers know that history proves otherwise even though the Constitution clearly states what the nation was established to do: "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and to our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." Notice that the phrases, "promote business" and "protect property"do not appear in this paragraph, but "promote the general Welfare" does. In fact the Constitution to this day contains nothing about Capitalism or any other economic ideology. The document is completely neutral as Justice Holmes, dissenting in Lochner v New York writes: "A Constitution is not intended to embody a particular economic theory, whether of paternalism and the organic relation of the citizen to the state. It is made for people of fundamentally differing views, and the accident of our finding certain options natural and familiar, or novel, and even shocking, ought not to conclude our judgment upon the question whether statutes embodying them conflict with the Constitution of the United States."  

Tomgram: The Most Important Story of Our Lives

By now, it's already deep election season, the beginning of the culmination of a cycle that commenced the day after the previous presidential election. In the meantime, the endless polls appear -you can check Obama's approval rating or the state of the presidential horse-race any time, night or day, and the media goes ballistic handicapping the odds or discussing the presidential cat fight. Each side's handlers take out after the other's, and increasingly, the corporate dollars pour in. You know the routine. These days, with the election a mere six months away, Romney/Obama "analysis" and prediction is already in the stratosphere and no issue, from war to a blind self-taught Chinese lawyer escaping to the American embassy in Beijing, is election-proof. It's all grist for the mill, and who in Washington isn't reading the polls the way a new Alger might read Tarot cards? So when President Obama suddenly starts talking, quite voluntarily, about global warming as a campaign issue, you know something is up. What's up, it turns out, is public concern over climate change after years of polling in which Americans claimed to be ever less worried about the phenomenon. No one should be surprised, given this overheated year in North America, as Bill McKibben points out in today's post. In fact, in the latest climate-change polling, 63% of respondents believe "the United States should move forward to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, regardless of what other countries do." In another recent poll, 65% of Americans backed the idea of "imposing mandatory controls on carbon dioxide emissions/other greenhouse gases" (as 75% now support regulating carbon dioxide as a "pollutant"). This is something new in America. Times, like the weather, are evidently a-changin'.      

Prof. Michel Chossudovsky: Nuclear War without a War!

The Unspoken Crisis of Worldwide Nuclear Radiation. The World is at a critical crossroads. The Fukushima disaster in Japan has brought to the forefront the dangers of Worldwide nuclear radiation. The crisis in Japan has been described as "a nuclear war without a war". In the words of renowned novelist Haruki Murakami: "This time no one dropped a bomb on us. We set the stage, we committed the crime with our own hands, we are destroying our own lands, and we are destroying our own lives." Nuclear radiation, which threatens life on planet earth, is not front page news in comparison to the most insignificant issues of public concern, including the local level crime scene or the tabloid gossip reports on Hollywood celebrities. While the long-term repercussions of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster are yet to be fully assessed, they are far more serious than those pertaining to the 1986 Chernobyl disaster in the Ukraine, which resulted in almost one million deaths. The Chernobyl death toll, 985,000, mostly from cancer, Global Research, September 10, 2010. See also Matthew Penney and Mark Seiden . Moreover, while all eyes were riveted on the Fukushima Daiichi plant, news coverage both in Japan and internationally failed to fully acknowledge the impacts of a second catastrophe at TEPCO's (Tokyo Electric Power Co Inc) Fukushima Daini nuclear power plant. The shaky political consensus both in Japan,, the US and Western Europe