Washington's Blog: Three Months after 9/11: US and NATO Worked with Bin Laden

and his top Lieutenant. Former FBI Translator Alleges that Bin Laden and His Number 2, Worked as Part of Operation Gladio. Former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds has been deemed credible by the Department of Justices Inspector General, several senators, and a coalition of prominent conservative and liberal groups. The ACLU described Edmond's as: The most gagged person in the history of the United States of America, and famed Pentagon Papers whistle-blower Daniel Ellsberg says that Edmonds possesses information far more explosive than the Pentagon Papers. Edmond's translated terror related communications for the FBI right after 9/11. In that capacity, she read communications between terrorists and other radicals. Edmonds said last week, that Bin Laden and his number 2 Al Qaeda lieutenant Ayman al Zawahiri, worked with the US government for 3 months after 9/11, to coordinate destabilization in the Caucus region: By way of background, the former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and the CIA, carried out terror bombings n Italy, and other European countries in the 1950s, and blamed the communists, in order to rally peoples support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism. As one participant in this formerly secret program stated: You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security, and see this: Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign, had joined NATO before the bombings occurred. This was codenamed Operation Gladio, and watch this BBC special.. And see this for background. Edmond's says that some portions of Operation Gladio are continuing to this day, and Ayman al Zawahiri and Bin Laden worked for NATO and the Pentagon, as part of Operation Gladio: Edmond's told us: For the past 11 years, I have been emphasizing that my State Secrets Privilege & Gag Orders, had to do with the FBI files, covering period 1996-2002 February on covert terrorist operations in the Caucasus and Central Asia backed, managed and armed by US actors. These US NATO directed operations in the region, involved Bin Laden and mainly Zawahiri. The FBI documents, contained damning evidence, audio and written, collected between 1996-2002, tying these terror operations directly to the US persons in the State Department/CIA and Pentagon. Also, how the State Department got Congress to grant huge amounts of funds to front NGO's and businesses, mainly Turkish companies in US listed Members of ATC, to funnel money to the terrorist cells in this region.
  

Noam Chomsky: The Boston Bombings Gave Americans a Taste,

of the Terrorism the US Inflicts abroad every day. April is usually a cheerful month in New England, with the first signs of spring, and the harsh winter at last receding. Not this year. There are a few in Boston, who were not touched in some way by the marathon bombings on April 15, and the tense week that followed. Several friends of mine were at the finish line when the bombs went off. Others live close to where Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the second suspect, was captured. The young police officer Sean Collier, was murdered right outside my office building. It's rare for privileged Westerners to see graphically, what many others experience daily, for example, in a remote village in Yemen, the same week as the marathon bombings. On April 23, Yemeni activist and journalist Farea Al Muslami,who had studied at an American high school, testified before a US Senate committee, that right after the marathon bombings, a drone strike in his home village in Yemen killed its target. The strike terrorized the villagers, turning them into enemies of the United States, something that years of jihadi propaganda had failed to accomplish. His neighbors had admired the US, Al Muslimi told the committee, but Now, however. when they think of America, they think of the fear they feel at the drones over their heads. What radicals had previously failed to achieve in my village, one drone strike accomplished in an instant. Rack up another triumph for President Obama's global assassination program, which creates hatred of the United States, and threats to its citizens more rapidly than it kills people who are suspected of posing a possible danger to us someday. The target of the Yemeni village assassination, which was carried out to induce maximum terror in the population, was well known, and could easily have been apprehended Al Muslimi said. This is another familiar feature of the global terror operations. There was no direct way to prevent the Boston murders. There are some easy ways to prevent likely future ones, by not inciting them. That's also true of another case of a suspect murdered, his body disposed of without autopsy, when he could easily have been apprehended and brought to trial: Osama bin Laden. This murder too had consequences. To locate bin Laden, the CIA launched a fraudulent vaccination campaign in a poor neighborhood, then switched it, uncompleted, to a richer area, where the suspect was thought to be. The CIA operation violated fundamental principles, as old as the Hippocratic oath. It also endangered health workers, associated with a polio vaccination program in Pakistan, several of whom were abducted ad killed, prompting the UN to withdraw its anti polio team.

Dr. Kevin Barrett: Al CIA duh exposed!

In yesterday's article Tsarnaev Brothers: 9/11 Truthers, and Obviously Innocent, I argued that pro 9/11 truth Muslims are obviously not a terrorist threat. The 80% of the world's Muslims, who know that 9/11 was a fraud, and al Qaeda a bunch of dupes, moles, and patsies, are hardly likely to carry out al Qaeda type operations on behalf of the neocon enemies of Islam! Unfortunately, a small minority of Muslims still accepts the official myth of 9/11. That neo conned minority includes some who view al Qaeda as the heroic fighters they claim to be, and among that tiny handful of people, some might be tempted to participate in al Qaeda plots, most of which are arranged by the FBI, Craft International, the Mossad, and related agencies. So, in the interest of fighting terrorism, and saving the next gullible Muslim teenager from being set up by the FBI, I am republishing Elias Davidsson's terrific article, pointing out that al Qaeda hardly ever targets the US, and never, ever targets Israel, the real dajjal, the ultimate enemy of Islam. Instead, al Qaeda specializes in killing large numbers of Muslims, while giving Islam as much publicity as possible, and legitimizing the mass murder of Muslims, in imperial and Zionist wars. So look out, Muslim kid, don't follow the al Qaeda leaders, watch the parking meters. Who are Al Qaeda's enemies? By Elias Davidsson, Muslims for 9/11 Truth. In a fatwa allegedly issued by Osama bin Laden in 1998, he called on Muslims to kill Americans and Jews, in order to contribute to the liberation of the Muslim people from US and Zionist oppression. After that date, Osama bin Laden was designated by Western leaders, and media as the leader of the ubiquitous Al Qaeda, and as the prime enemy of Western democracy. Taking Osama bin Laden's fatwa seriously, one would have expected Muslim volunteers to start a world wide campaign of attacks, specifically targeting Americans and Jews around the world. We discover, however, that this did not happen. On the contrary, hardly any Jews and Israelis were attacked by Al Qaeda, And only a few Americans died at the hand of Al Qaeda operatives. Here a brief overview: Al Qaeda does not target Israelis, Jews and Americans. Despite Al Qaeda rhetoric of solidarity with the struggle of the Palestinian people, and the aforementioned fatwa attributed to Osama bin Laden, there are no recorded attacks by Al Qaeda aimed at Israeli territory, Israeli installations abroad, or Israeli citizens. There are only two or three known attacks attributed to Al Qaeda, that allegedly targeted Jewish Synagogues, Djerba, Tunisia and Istanbul Turkey.

Dr Paul Craig Roberts: The Events of 9/11: Does the Truth Have a Chance?

These days, as the word "terrorism" is tossed across mainstream media networks with reckless abandon, it brings back vivid memories of September 11, 2001, the day that launched the seemingly endless War on Terrorism. Are we any closer today to knowing the truth about what happened on that fateful day? Now more than ever, let us not only renew our efforts to expose the truth, but also take our awareness a step further, to understand that the wars launched since that autumn day in 2001, in the bitterly ironic name of justice and supposedly to combat terrorism continue to take lives of people across the world. These wars are based on lies, and their costs are staggering. As Dr Paul Craig Roberts wrote: In the US on September 11, 2011, the tenth anniversary of 9/11, politicians and their presstitute media presented Americans with A Day of Remembrance, a propaganda excercise that hardened the 9/11 lies into dogma. Meanwhile, in Toronto Canada, at Ryerson University the four day International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001, came to a close at 5PM. During the four days of hearings, distinguished scientists and scholars, and professional architects and engineers, presented the results of years of their independent research into all aspects of 9/11 to a distinguished panel, consisting of the honorary president of the Italian Supreme Court, who was an investigative judge, who presided over terrorism cases, and three distinguished scholars of high renown and judgment. The distinguished panels task is to produce a report with their judgment of the evidence presented by the expert witnesses. The Toronto Hearings were streamed live over the Internet. I was able to watch many of the presentations over the four days. I was impressed that the extremely high level of intelligence and scientific competence of the witnesses, was matched by a high level of intelligence and scientific competence of the witnesses, was matched by a high level of integrity, a quality rare in US politics, and totally absent in the American media. As one whose own contributions to economics, now belatedly recognized, are outside the box, I am responsive to those who can escape peer pressure, in order to advance the truth. Here are some of the important things I learned from the Toronto Hearings. The NIST, National Institute of Standards and Technology, a government agency, reports on the twin towers and building 7 are fraudulent. Witnesses at the Toronto Hearings proved that building 7 was a standard controlled demolition and that incendiaries and explosives brought down the twin towers. 
   

Shamus Cooke: Should We Invade Syria? Obama and US Military Divided Over Syria!

Has Syria crossed the red line that warrants a US military invasion? Has it not? The political establishment in the United States seems at odds over itself. Obama's government cannot speak with one voice on the issue, and the US media is likewise spewing from both sides of its mouth, in an attempt to reconcile US foreign policy, with that most stubborn of annoyances, the truth. The New York Times reports: "The White House said on Thursday, that American intelligence agencies now believed, with varying degrees of confidence, that the Syrian government had used chemical weapons Immediately afterwards, Obama's Secretary of Defense, Chuck Hagel, gave a blunt rebuke: Suspicions are one thing, evidence is another. This disunity mirrored the recent disagreement that Chuck Hagel had with Obama's Secretary of State, John Kerry, when both testified in front of Congress, with nearly opposite versions of what was happening in Syria, and how the US should respond. Kerry was a cheerleader for intervention, while Hagel, the military's mouthpiece advised caution. The US government's internal squabbling, over whether the Syrian government used chemical weapons, is really an argument on whether the US should invade Syria, since Obama claimed that any use of chemical weapons was a red line that, if crossed, would invoke an American military response. Never mind that Obama's red line rhetoric was stolen from the mouth of Bush Jr, who enjoyed saying all kinds of similar stupid things to sound tough. But now Obama's 'Bushism' must be enforced, say the politicians, less the US look weak by inaction. This seemingly childish argument is in fact very compelling among the US political establishment, who view foreign policy only in terms of military power. If Syria is not frightened into submission by US military threats, then Iran and other countries might follow suit, and do as they please, and US influence would wane. Only a firm response can stop this domino effect from starting. This type of logic is the basis for the recent Syria chemical accusations, which was conjured up by the US Intelligence service (CIA) and its British and Israeli counter parts, the same people who "proved" that Iraq had Weapons of Mass Destruction, which later proved to be a fabricated lie. All three of these countries intelligence agencies simply announced that the Syrian government has used chemical weapons, provided zero evidence, and then let their respective nations' media run with the story, which referred to the baseless accusations as mounting evidence. In the real world, it appears that the US backed Syrian rebels are the ones responsible for having used chemical weapons, and asked the UN to investigate the attack.    

Jim Fetzer: Mystery Solved: The WTC was Nuked on 9/11!

A debate has raged for more than a decade, about what caused the Twin Towers to collapse in approximately 10 seconds each, 9 seconds for the South Tower, 11 for the North. A large and growing percentage of the public has become skeptical of the conclusion of the government's official NIST found no corroborating evidence for alternative hypotheses, suggesting that WTC towers were brought down by controlled demolition, using explosives planted prior to 9/11. Skepticism of NIST's conclusions is well founded. There is eyewitness testimony as well, as abundant video and audio evidence of explosions at the WTC on 9/11. There is also seismic data that demonstrates that high powered explosives were used to demolish the Twin Towers. The gross observable video evidence, if you are willing to believe your own eyes, shows that the Twin Towers were destroyed from the top down  and the inside out. We believe that only mini nukes, which were probably neutron bombs, planted in the center columns of the buildings, detonated from top to bottom, and configured to explode upward, can explain what is observed. If they were used to blow apart one ten floor cube per second, for example, then, since the North Tower stood at 110 floors, that would have taken 11 seconds, while, since the top three cubes of the South Tower were tilted over and blown as one, in that case, it would have taken only 9, which coincides with NIST's own times. This is a controversial contention. Judy Wood, Ph.D. has proclaimed that a Tesla inspired directed energy weapon (DEW) was responsible for the destruction of the WTC buildings, and has vehemently denied nuclear bombs were used. Steve Jones, Ph.D. and his followers promote the theory that an incendiary nano-thermite was the cause of the destruction of the WTC buildings, while they also deny that nukes were used. So these seemingly opposed camps agree on one thing: nukes were not used on 9/11! The nano-thermite hypothesis has been discredited on multiple occasions, in articles by T. Mark Hightower and Jim Fetzer, including Has nano-thermite been oversold to the 9/11 community? Is 9/11 truth based upon a false theory? and Nanothermite: If it doesn't fit, you must aquit. Since it is a principle, meaning law of materials science that an explosive can destroy a material only if it has a detonation velocity equal to, or greater than the speed of sound in that material, detonation velocity equal to or greater than the speed of sound in that material, where the speed of sound in concrete is 3,200 m/s and in steel 6,100 m/s, while the highest detonation velocity that has been attributed to nanothermite is 895 m/s, it should be obvious: You can't get there from here!    

Prof. James Petras: Boston Bombings: Detonator to Mobilize the Entire US Security Apparatus!

May change the world for the worse. The relation between the suspected Boston Marathon bombers and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Massachusetts State Police (BP) is a point of contention and controversy. The FBI, at first, claimed no knowledge of the bombing suspects, but later was forced to admit having received at least two sets of intelligence reports, one from Russian officials, and another from the CIA, identifying one of the suspected bombers, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, as a potential security threat, linked to a Chechen terrorist organization. Testimony from Tsarnaev mother and father indicates that the FBI was active in following, harassing and interrogating the suspect before the bombing. Despite general directives from the US Departments of Justice and Homeland Security, mandating US security to aggressively pursue Islamist terrorists, the FBI claims to have made no effort to follow up on the Russian and CIA security alerts, especially after Tamerlan Tsarnaev returned from Russian state of Dagestan last year, where he allegedly met six times with a known Chechen terrorist, Gadzhimurad Dolgatov, in a fundamentalist Salafi mosque. The official government and corporate media versions claim the FBI may have overlooked the security risk posed by Tsarnaev. Congressional critics argue that the FBI was negligent in following up leads provided by the Russians and the CIA. A more likely explanation is that the FBI was actively engaged with Tsarnaev and deliberately encouraged the conspiracy for self serving purposes. The most benign hypothesis is that the Boston office of the FBI had set the pair of brothers up for a sting operation, in order to revive the flagging fortunes of the war on terror, foisted on a war weary and economically depressed American public. The FBI in Boston has a long and notorious history of working with and protecting certain leaders of organized crime, in return for information about targeted rivals: The most notorious example is the FBI's 20 year partnership with one of Bostons most feared gangland killers, James Whitney Bulger, where the mobster was provided with protection and collaboration, in return for his information about a rival crime family and other competitors. In 2012, Bulger was finally indicted for 19 murders, mostly committed under FBI protection, although one of his closest mob partners claim he murdered 40 people in his lifetime.