How do you convince the world that even though you're armed to the teeth and have a bad track record of invading countries, you really have "no choice" but to make a "pre-emptive military strike" against another country you don't like? Question: How do you convince the world that even though you're armed to the teeth and have a bad track record of invading countries you really have "no choice" but make a "pre-emptive military strike" against another country you don't like? This must be the question over which the political, military and psychological warfare planners are wracking their brains out in the key global power elite decision-making centers in New York, London, Tel-Aviv and Washington. No, I'm not referring to the State Department, Pentagon, White House, Congress and their counterparts in Britain and Europe. Those folks just take their orders and execute them. I'm referring to the real decision-makers at Bilderberg, Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations and AIPAC (American Israeli Public Affairs Committee) meetings. And if the governments don't come to any solution, well then, as Baby Bush used to say,"All options are on the table". At least that's what militant pro-Israeli Zionist Andrew B. Adler, owner and publisher of the "Atlanta Jewish Times" recommends in an article published on page 3 of his newspaper on January 13. Adler wants Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu to act now against Iran, Hezbollah and Hamas, either severally or jointly, and to: Order a pre-emptive strike against Hezbollah and Hamas.
Many years ago, when I served as Intelligence Operations Officer for the 4th US Armored Division in Germany, I intercepted a transmission from the USS Liberty, which was being machine gunned by Israeli Warplanes. At the time, General Sherrer, the commander of our division commented: With friends like Israel, we have no need of enemies!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment