Iran still wants Russian S-300 system missiles to defend against Israeli aggression.

Iran WILL file a court claim against Russia if that country does not fulfill its contract for the supply of the anti-aircraft missile system S-300. Russia had promised five battalions of S-300PMU-1, to be paid for with $800 million. According to Russia, this contract can probably not be executed as planned, because of UN sanctions against Iran. According to the existing practice, the party at fault must pay ten percent of the transaction value to Iran, which means that Russia could lose $80 million. In the long term, such supply disruptions could lead to the loss of the important Iranian market by Russia, which may then be picked up by default by Chinese contractors. According to Ivan Konovalov, this may be a crude disruption of the close cooperation by the Russians with the Iranian administration. Tehran clearly believes that Russia shares all of the blame, and other countries will think twice before they opt for Russian weapons systems.

A Venezuelan "Nuqular" Presence in our Backyard!

When will "Obama's" problems ever stop: Now, the Venezuelan nuclear program may be added to the Iranian and North Korean nuclear programs in the near future: The announcement was made the other day by Hugo Chavez. Expert Vladimir Khrustalev spoke of the reasons for such intentions and the prospects of a nuclear project in Venezuela with Pravda.ru. According to Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez: "We undertook this nuclear energy project for "peaceful" purposes, and no one will stop us. We need this program, and now we are conducting initial preliminary tests." According to Chavez, the program is "exclusively peaceful in nature", and his country's goal is similar to the existence of nuclear weapons in Israel, which refuses to accede to the Non-Proliferation Treaty. Chavez is considered by Washington as a major troublemaker in Latin America, which has traditionally been considered as the "American backyard". Though Chavez keeps stressing the peaceful nature of his nuclear plans, transformation of the country into a possible site for nuclear weapons might be offensive to Obama's yet undisclosed plans.

Michael Moore: Civilian Control of the Military is a Joke!!

Do you still remember President Eisenhower's warning about the "Military Industrial" Complex??
In Bob Woodward's new book: "Obama's War", you'll split a gut every time you hear a politician or a government employee talk about "civilian control of the military". The only people REALLY making the decisions about America's wars are across the river from Washington in the Pentagon. Many years ago, after I was no longer Intelligence Operations Officer of our 4th US Armored Division in Goeppingen, I was given a tour of the Pentagon by Steve Mayfield, who had tried to convince me to work for the CIA in East Germany. After Steve had dropped off his documents to one of the more important Generals, we walked through most of the Pentagon, to see how the "other" side lives. But I digress: As Michael Moore documents, the only people REALLY making decisions about America's wars are in the "Pentagon", which I consider an occult bunker, where evil plans are made to destroy our planet. For everyone who supported Obama in 2008, it's reassuring to find out he understands that we have to get out of Afghanistan. Or does he? Whatever his beliefs, does he really understand that we have to get out of that god-forsaken country? Only time will tell!

900 Billion for Afghan Defense, not one cent for US Teachers!

Good news: Sometime between 2013 and 2016, US surge forces in Afghanistan "might" be drawn down to dip "somewhere" below the 68,000 level! (Unless, of course, there are 'unforeseen' events). When Obama entered office, and just before he picked up his Nobel Peace Prize from a VERY confused Prize Committee, there were only 31,000 US troops in Afghanistan). When would our troops dwindle to near zero? 2019? 2025? NEVER? - We ignorant taxpayers have no way of knowing, as long as our wonderful news-media continues to worship in front of Obama's shrine. Our 'high command', civilian and military, are dreaming of, and most forcefully recommending to the president, a "forever" war - one which the Office of Budget and Management, estimated would cost almost $900 billion - after all, it's ONLY money. (OUR MONEY). Before you sink into despair, please check some wonderful "how to" books on Amazon.com: The American Way of War: How Bush's Wars became Obama's, Chalmers Johnson's Dismantling the Empire: America's Last Best Hope, Nick Turse's The Case for Withdrawal from Afghanistan, and Andrew Basevich's bestselling "Washington Rules: America's Path to Permanent War". All are connected, some more intimately than others, to give you some hope for America's future!

Democrats to run man who "Played Obama" During his 2008 Campaign!

Disgusted by their "president's" erratic behavior in recent months, Democrats have decided to re-hire the man who 'played' the president during his 2oo8 campaign. After a democratic 'brainstorming' conference to recover what might have remained of Obama's reputation, the desperate president's staff remembered the man who played Obama during his campaign. You see, Democratic politicians have been shying away from appearing with President Obama at rallies in recent weeks. When they put out the word that the Democrats were again reaching out to the guy who used to play Obama, the reaction was phenomenal - People still loved that guy. According to preliminary plans, the guy who played Obama in 2008 would be used to fire up huge crowds in key races, while the actual President Obama would remain behind in Washington giving boring speeches about electronic medical records. Fox News offered scant coverage of the Democrats' plans, except to report that neither President Obama, nor the man who played him in 2008 was born in the United States.

The REAL Facts about Ahmadinejad's UN Speech

Yes, folks, we've been lied to again and again: This time it's about Ahmadinejad's UN Speech: The Iranian leader did NOT accuse the US of conspiring to murder thousands of its own people to create a pretext for launching wars as conveyed by the US media. In its Sept. 24 article about the speech, the New York Times headline read: "Iran Leader Says US Planned 9/11 Attacks". The first paragraph declared: "President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran made a series of incendiary remarks in his speech to the United Nations General Assembly on Thursday, notably the claim that the United States orchestrated the Sept. 11 attacks to rescue its declining economy, to reassert its weakening grip on the Middle East and to save Israel." In other words: "All the news that's unfit to print". On the basis of his alleged remarks, the US led 33 nations in a theatrical walk out from the General Assembly while he was talking, which most 'civilized' people would rightly consider rude, rude, rude. Finally, on Sept .25, the Times published a correction, which was probably inserted just under the newspaper's help wanted ads. The Times was one of many US newspapers , TV and radio news reports that suggested Ahmadinejad accused the US government of secretly instigating the attack. The actual text of the Iranian leader's speech should have read: "It was said that some three thousands people were killed on the 11 September for which we are all very saddened. Yet up until now, in Afghanistan and Iraq hundreds of thousands of people have been killed, millions wounded and displaced and the conflict is still going on and expanding." For the rest of his speech, please click on the heading of this correct report of the Iranian Leader's words.

CIA blames new, Improved "Terrorist" for 911

Great news: Saudi Osama bin Laden was replaced (or is about to be replaced) by US born native of Yemen Anwar al-Awlaki. There is no "official" confirmation of this information, but it is "possible" that this may be true (inshallah). Anyways, some of the bookies in Las Vegas are already beginning to take bets on that VERY remote possibility. While those of us who have done our homework KNOW that the "towers" went down because Silverstein, the owner of these buildings was too cheap to replace the asbestos in his towers with more environment and people-friendly insulation, the ragged masses of our population, the ones whose sons (or daughters) are even now walking up and down between the mountains of Afghanistan, in a failed search for "Obama bin Laden", al-Awlali, born in New Mexico in a family originating in Yemen, a man who studied engineering at the University of Colorado, is now our country's newest suspect in the 911 tragedy. However, it "seems" that he was NOT interested in the scientific or industrial activity. "Somewhere" in the middle of the 1990's, the young man became a follower of radical Islam. Supposedly, he shared his ideas in the mosques of San Diego and Fort Collins. As Paul Craig Roberts truthfully pointed out in "Global Research", the West never had any morality. Nevertheless, things have gotten worse. When I was merely five years old, my grandmother, mother, and I watched the "Allied" - (Britain and the USA) firebombing of Dresden from a nearby hill, expending more destructive force, according to some historians, against the German civilian population than against the German armies, and today the US enables Israel's genocidal policies against the Palestinians, policies that Paul Craig Roberts says one Israeli has compared to 19th century US genocidal policies against the American Indians, that the US in the new 21st century invaded Iraq and Afghanistan on contrived pretenses, murdering countless numbers of civilians, and that British prime minister Tony Blair lent the British Army to his American masters, as did other NATO countries, all of whom find themselves committing war crimes under the Nuremberg standard in lands in which they have no national interest, but for which they receive an American pay check.
Don't waste your time and energy in researching the US government fable about the alleged Arab attack against the 911 Towers owned by Silverstein: Instead, search the "web" by clicking on "911 Truth" and read the Truth for yourself (It will truly set you free).

What we know for sure that makes Obama ineligible to be our "President"

There isn't a single, credible source that has any concrete facts whatsoever that Obama was born in Hawaii: Hawaii's Department of Education has been unable to find AKA Obama's Kindergarten records. Obama's Noelani Elementary School Kindergarten records are also missing from the State of Hawaii Department of Education, the first in a series of chronological "coincidences" that obscure Obama's history. Although Obama has allegedly had a first-class education that spanned 25 years, there is only a single document that has never been released, the application for entrance to the Franciscus Assissi Primary School - and that document was discovered by independent investigators. This is an important feature because Kindergarten records for original school entry would have contained the following: His legal name, Parents or Legal Guardians' names, Date of Birth, Place of Birth, Vaccination Records. The Department of Education does not "loose" the records of one particular student - So who paid whom what sum to make that record disappear? There would have been NO shameful low-test scores, NO embarrassing Equal Opportunity advancements, and NO trails of fraudulent funding to hide, that could possibly excuse the quashing of public school Kindergarten entry records. For the rest of his life he attended very expensive private schools and has had his records legally sealed to deny the public his true life story.

Is the Military Undermining the Constitution?

20,000, 30,000, or 40,000 troops - to "win" in Afghanistan? The prognosis is devastating. According to General Davis Petraeus: "This is the kind of fight we're in for the rest of our lives, and probably our kid's lives." Why fight a war that even the general in charge says can't be won? Whom will it benefit? What will the perpetuation of this conflict cost? Does the ostensibly most powerful nation in the world have no choice but to wage permanent war? Are there no alternatives? President Obama has repeatedly stated that in July 2011 a withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan will commence. Will the "withdrawal" be symbolic, or are we looking at another case of our president's broken promises? Jeff Rense, in his huge web site, had the answer a long, long time ago, when he persuaded his illustrator to comment on Obama's abuse of his receipt of the Nobel Peace Prize, essentially violating the intention of it's founder, who wanted to atone for his development of dangerous explosives: "Nobel Peace Prize with oil change". Surely Nobel is even now turning over in his grave!

Ahmadinejad blames the US for Warmongering

The Iranian president started his speech before the United Nations by explaining his version of the 9-11 attacks against the US. According to the Iranian leader, the attacks could have been organized either by terrorists or officials of the US administration who intended to justify the scheduled wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Iranian president chose the second version and did not forget to mention his other sworn enemy - Israel. He said: "The majority of the American people as well as most nations and politicians around the world agree that some segments within the US government orchestrated the September 11, 2001 attacks in order to reverse the declining American economy and to justify US military operations in the Middle East to save the Zionist regime." Ahmadinejad urged the UN to conduct the independent of the 9/11 events. Defending Iran's right for the nuclear program, he accused the USA and its allies of attempts to impede the technological progress of other countries, confirming his reputation as one of the most controversial politicians of the world. Please read the entire story by clicking on the heading of this document!