Dr.Kevin Barrett: New World Order kills Democracy in Egypt!

On Sunday, the Egyptian army and police slaughtered 51 unarmed, praying protestors. The victims were part of a crowd praying outside the Republican National Guard headquarters in Cairo, where President Morsi, assuming he is still alive, is being held. President Morsi is the first democratically elected head of state in Egypt's 5,000 year history. The way things are going, he could also be the last. The army's demolition of democracy, and its massacre of peaceful, unarmed protestors, seem likely to spark a civil war in Egypt. And civil wars do not end in democracy. Why would Egypt's fascist military leaders and the deep state they represent want civil war? The Egyptian deep state consists of comprador billionaires and a corrupt military elite that lives on US aid. These people take orders from the global powers that be, the Bilderbergers, the Rothschilds, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, and their bought and paid for politicians. So if Egypt's military has decided to massacre peaceful protestors at prayer, you can be sure that they are doing so as part of a larger strategy formulated by the globalists. To understand that strategy, we must listen to the paid mouthpieces of the New World Order, and interpret their words. Two of the New World Order's biggest megaphones are the editorialists of the Wall Street Journal, and interpret their words. Two of the New World Order's biggest megaphones are the editorialists of the Wall Street Journal, and Thomas Friedman of The New York Times. Last Friday, the Wall Street Journal ordered Egypt's junta to follow in the footsteps of Pinochet's Chile: Egyptians would be lucky if their new ruling generals turn out to be in the mold of Chile's Augusto Pinochet, who took over power amid chaos but hired free-market reformers and midwifed a transition to democracy. Pinochet was one of the worst butchers of the 20th century. After overthrowing and murdering democratically elected President Allende in a CIA sponsored coup on September 11th, 1971, Pinochet's goons filled football stadiums full of people, tortured them and massacred them. So The Wall Street Journal wants Egypt's junta to kill Morsi, just like Pinochet killed Allende, and employ widespread torture and mass murder. All in the name of democracy. When the Egyptian junta decided to massacre the protesters outside Morsi's prison, they were following the orders of the New World Order oligarchy, the people who own The Wall Street Journal and dictate its output. Why do the Wall Street Journal's owners want Egypt's junta to massacre Muslim leaders and destroy political Islam in Egypt, in the same way that the CIA's Pinochet massacred socialist leaders and destroyed socialism in Chile? Let's ask Thomas Friedman, the New World Order's leading middlebrow mouthpiece.

Editor Jim Fetzer: The Debate over 9/11 Truth:

Dick Eastman vs. Jim Fetzer. Dick Eastman and I are going to have a public debate over whether or not the Twin Towers were hit by Boeing 767s, which he claims is true but I deny. It will be held on The Mike Harris Show on Thursday, 18 July 2013, from 3-5 PM CT on the Rense Radio Network. So those who care about these issues may want to join us. It will be a two hour program with the time to speak allocated impartially between us about a crucial bone of contention regarding 9/11. As the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, it has been my fate to receive attacks from all sides, including the thermite sniffers, Steve Jones, Kevin Ryan, and their allies, but also by the plane huggers, including Anthony Lawson, and Dick Eastman, not to mention the members of the Judy Wood alliance, which displays the features that are characteristic of a cult. I am not claiming they are a formal cult, but behave as though they were, by having the mentality of those who are locked into a feeling of certainty, will tolerate no criticism and blindly follow their leader. The first group, the thermite sniffers, has been defeated by a series of articles co-authored with T. Mark Hightower, a chemical engineer, Has nano-thermite been oversold to the 9/11 Truth community? Is 9/11 Truth based upon a false theory? and Nanothermite: If it doesn't fit, you must acquit, which has been complemented by new research supporting the conclusion that the Twin Towers were destroyed by means of mini or micro nukes, including 9/11 Truth will out: The Vancouver Hearings II, Mini-Neutron Bombs: A Major Piece of the 9/11 Puzzle, and Mystery Solved: The WTC was Nuked on 9/11. The situation with the Wood's cult, which includes the dogma of DEWS, the sacred text, Where did the Towers Go?, a mystical leader Judy Wood herself, and a praetorian guard that viciously attacks anyone who questions those views, as 3,000 attacks on me for an originally 5-star review, now downgraded to 3 stars following The Vancouver Hearings, vividly displays, is more complex. While we disagree about how the Twin Towers were destroyed, key members of this group, including Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds, agree with me that no Big Boeings-757s at Shanksville and the Pentagon, 767s at the North and South Towers crashed on 9/11, which makes them allies on this aspect of 9/11, which makes them allies on this aspect of 9/11. Morgan was the first to make a public splash about no planes when he appeared on FOX NEWS 2008, which appears to have been a set up to discredit him when the anchor brings up the idea of no planes, given the videos the rest of us saw, as though any of us who deny that Boeing 757s and 767s crashed on 9/11 had not seen them. He did what he could on that show: More important, Morgan published a piece by Joe Keith, who was a software engineer who designed the on the ground shaker system for Boeing, who points out that the videos show the plane passing through its whole length into the building!   

Jonas E. Alexis: God and the Intellectuals!

For the scientist who has lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad dream. He has scaled the mountains of ignorance, he is about to conquer the highest peak, as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries. Agnostic Astronomer Robert Jastrow. During the early part of the twentieth century, one popular movement among philosophers was logical positivism, which limited truth to what could be empirically verified by the five senses or experience. At its core, the movement sought to deconstruct revelation, chiefly theological assertions, or anything else that appeared to be beyond the five senses. If something cannot be verified by the five senses, logical positivists dismissed them as meaningless. Over the course of more than a decade, logical positivists launched their ideas with great energy and passion, willing to crush anyone who stood in their way. Yet the movement could not gain much intellectual ground because its founding principle was self-defeating. After all, can the proposition "any statement that cannot be empirically verified is meaningless" itself be empirically verified? No. It is an axiomatic proposition, nothing less, nothing more. In the end, logical positivism ceased to carry any intellectual weight and quietly slipped out of academia, although it continued to impact many people. Over the course of more than a decade, logical positivists launched their ideas with great energy and passion, willing to crush anyone who stood in their way. Yet the movement could not gain much intellectual ground because its founding principle was self-defeating. After all, can the proposition any statement that cannot be empirically verified is meaningless, itself be empirically verified? No. It is an axiomatic proposition, nothing less, nothing more. In the end, logical positivism ceased to carry any intellectual weight and quietly slipped out of academia, although it continued to impact many people. Of course, the verification principle was later modified by people like Sir A J Ayer in Language, Truth, and Logic, but that modification itself was fraught with logical inconsistency. Ayer, who was largely responsible for spreading the gospel of logical positivism in England, asserted in 1936 that a proposition is said to be verifiable, in the strong sense of the term, if, and only if, its truth could be conclusively established by experience. Yet this bold proposition fails to pass its own test. Ayer seems to have foreseen the implication of the statement, and moves on to declare that if we adopt conclusive verifiability as our criterion of significance, as some positivists have proposed, our argument will prove too much.

Jim W. Dean: Zionist Link to Egyptian Army Exposed!

Israel warns US against Egypt aid cut. Israel has always kept its close coordination with Egypt's military low key, even though the Camp David Accords required some obvious interaction. But on the other hand, the Israelis have actually defaulted on them as their own archives show they never had any intention of fulfilling any plans for a Palestinian peace. They figured they could always negotiate indefinitely, or not, and blame that on the Palestinians. No political entity in America would ever challenge them on their bad faith. But their going public supporting the US subsidy to the Egyptian army was totally unnecessary. It was not needed, since the Obama administration had already worked out a way to avoid cutting off aid through the interim government being set up right away with a call for early elections. But the Israelis would never do something like this for no reason, and that reason would never be for anyone else's benefit but theirs. So I must assume that they wanted to taint the Egyptian military as pro Israeli to stoke the probability of more Muslim Brotherhood violence against them to crank up another Syrian style blood letting and destabilization. The Israeli regime has reportedly warned Washington against cutting military aid to Egypt in response to the ouster of President Mohamed Morsi by the African country's army. Israeli officials repeatedly asked senior American officials not to halt the USD 1.3 billion in aid, the US administration gives to Egypt every year, Israeli daily Haaretz said on Tuesday, citing an unnamed American official. The paper said that marathon phone calls about the recent development in Egypt took place between Israeli and American officials over the weekend. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had a telephone conversation with US Secretary of State John Kerry, while Minister of Military Affairs Moshe Ya'alon spoke with US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel. The calls were aimed at coordinating US and Israel position on Egypt following the overthrow of Morsi's government, the American official said. The Tel Aviv regime warned that the US aid cut would likely have negative impacts on Israel's security, particularly its peace treaty with Egypt. The American official also told the daily that the Tel Aviv regime as worried that the US government would suspend the annual military aid. The paper added that Israel might ask the US administration to find a way to continue supplying aid to Egypt. Under the US law, the government has to suspend foreign aid to any country whose elected leader is toppled in a coup. Obama has so far stopped short of describing the events in Egypt as a coup. White House spokesman Jay Carney said on Monday that the US administration would not stop providing military aid to Egypt as it was still reviewing whether or not to label Morsi's ouster a coup.

Veterans Today: VA Grants Will Expand Transportation in Highly Rural Areas!

Veterans to Have Easier Access to Health Care. Veterans will have improved access to health care under a Department of Veterans Affairs initiative that supports new transportation services for those living in highly rural areas. VA began accepting applications this month for grants to help state Veterans Service Agencies and Veterans Service Organizations (VSOs) operate or contract for transportation services to transport Veterans to VA medical centers and other facilities that provide VA care. A new regulation establishes the program that will administer these grants. Transportation will be provided at no cost to Veterans. VA wants to be sure that all Veterans, including those who live in rural and remote areas, can receive the health care they have earned through service to our country, said Secretary of Veterans Affairs Eric K. Shinseki. State Veterans Agencies and VSOs will now be able to employ innovative approaches to transportation services for Veterans in our highly rural areas. The end results will include better service and better health care for Veterans. VSOs and State Veterans Service Agencies may apply for grants up to $50,000 to fund transportation of Veterans to and from VA medical centers and other facilities that provide VA care. If specified in the application, the services may be provided under agreements with contractors, such as private bus or van companies. A highly rural area is defined as a country or counties with a population of fewer than seven persons per square mile. Many highly rural areas are found in the western and southwestern United States, but at least half of the states have at least one highly rural area. One of Secretary Shinseki's top three priorities is increasing access to VA care and services for Veterans wherever they live. VA is expanding access in a three pronged effort that includes facilities, programs and technology. Veterans who served in Iraq or Afghanistan are eligible for an extended period of eligibility for 5 years after they have left the service. For more information, please see the Federal Register.

Corina Notyce: Five Stratcies for Finding Peace in the Turbulence of Caregiving!

As a caregiver for her husband with traumatic brain injury, Rosemary Rawlins shares insights garnered through her own experiences along with insights garnered through her own experiences along with insights from other caregivers and family members in her blog, Learning by Accident, on Brain Line. In this blog post, Rosemary shares five strategies to help you, the caregiver, rest, relax and recharge while caring for someone you love with TBI. The human brain takes a long time to heal after trauma, and so it follows that caring for a loved one with brain injury can feel like an eternity. On top of that, outcomes from traumatic brain injury are hardly unpredictable. Odd symptoms come and go, personalities, roles, and relationships change, and stress can mount with each passing day. How can a caregiver tap into a sense of peace along the way? Here are a few strategiesthat worked for me, when I had the sense and presence of mind to use them! Accept not knowing. Accept what you know for what it is, and realize that you cannot change what already happened. You cannot accurately predict what already happened. You cannot accurately predict what may happened. You cannot accurately predict what may happen. But you can draw strength and breathe life into today by accepting it as it is without judgment. Create your own sacred space. A special chair, a sun porch, or a window seat can be the place you visit when you need to catch your breath. Keep a few favorite items near that space: a sacred statue, your own personal amulets, a framed quote or prayer that soothes you, or even worry beads or a stress ball to grip when you feel combustible. Sometimes, you may need to leave a volatile situation, just walk away, but try not to stomp and visit your safe space. Returning there again and again can direct your thoughts, spiritually, and guide you when you feel a deep sense of anger, anxiety or grief. Carve out small bits of time to revive. Make it a daily practice to use whatever small amounts of time you can find during the day to dedicate to yourself. When Hugh was exhausted after his rehab visits, he usually came home, ate and fell asleep for a while. I would go out on the back door and sit in the sun, read or just take in the spring air and breathe. Using these small windows of time to listen to music, read poetry, stretch or listen to music, read poetry, stretch or listen to a guided imagery tape for relaxation will give you the energy you need to continue on. Discover your mantra. The words we tell ourselves have incredible power over our moods and behavior. Find the words that calm you and repeat them to yourself throughout the daywhen you feel anger, fear or frustration spinning out of control. I often said the serenity prayer in my mind. It seems to cover all the bases for TBI care-giving! Some lyrics work well too, something short and sweet you can say over and over to yourself instead of the litany of defeat that replays in your mind. Here are two short lyric mantras that might work as well: Let it be, by the Beatles, and All will be well, the Gabe Dixon Band. And don't forget Norman Vincent Peale's sage advice: Change your thoughts and you change the world. 

Syria Invites U.N. Chemical Arms Chief, But Access Is In Doubt

The government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad invited chief U.N. chemical weapons investigator Ake Sellstrom to Damascus to discuss allegations of banned arms use in Syria’s civil war but suggested it would not compromise on access.
Syrian U.N. Ambassador Bashar Ja’afari told reporters that U.N. disarmament chief Angela Kane was also invited to Syria for talks about the U.N. chemical investigation.
So far Sellstrom’s team has not been active on Syrian territory because Assad’s government is only willing to allow it access to the city of Aleppo, where both sides have accused the other of using chemical weapons, Reuters reports.
“We are sure that Ms Kane and Dr Sellstrom will have constructive negotiations with the Syrian officials in order to reach an agreement, a mutual agreement on the terms of reference, mechanism and time frame of the mission,” he said.
Ja’afari said if they accept, the U.N. officials will be meeting with the Syrian foreign minister and national experts.
The Syrian envoy also made a fresh allegation against the rebels, suggesting they were stockpiling toxic chemicals.
“The Syrian authorities have discovered yesterday in the city of Banias 281 barrels filled with dangerous, hazardous chemical materials,” he said, adding that the chemicals were “capable of destroying a whole city, if not the whole country.”
Ja’afari said an investigation of the chemicals – which included monoethylene glycol and polyethylene glycol and were found at a storage site he said was linked to the “armed terrorist groups” – was still underway.
The Syrian government has denied using chemical weapons. It has in turn accused rebels of deploying them in the two-year civil war that the United Nations says has killed over 90,000 people since March 2011. The rebels deny responsibility for any chemical attacks.
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has urged Syria to give Sellstrom unfettered access to investigate all alleged chemical arms incidents. But Assad’s government only wants the U.N. team to probe an incident in Aleppo from March, not others the U.S., Britain and France have written to Ban about. U.N. officials say U.N.-Syria negotiations on access have reached a deadlock.
Ja’afari was asked if the invitation to Sellstrom and Kane meant that Syria would consider allowing the U.N. team to go beyond Aleppo. He indicated that his government would not permit that, saying: “No, you wouldn’t jump to this conclusion.”
WRANGLING OVER ACCESS
Ban’s spokesman Martin Nesirky did not say whether the U.N. investigators would accept the invitation, which he described as “a move in the right direction.” He said the Syrian government needed to grant Sellstrom’s team broad access across Syria “without further delay and without conditions.”
Sellstrom’s team has been ready for well over two months to enter Syria but has been held up by the wrangling over access.
They recently visited neighboring to try to gather information. Acting U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Rosemary DiCarlo told reporters Sellstrom was in Washington on Monday for discussions with U.S. officials.
Ja’afari repeated Syria’s allegation that accusations of chemical attacks by government forces were an attempt to undermine their initial request for a U.N. investigation focusing solely on the Aleppo incident from March.
One senior Western diplomat said last month that Britain and the United States alone have notified Ban of 10 separate incidents of the use of chemical weapons by Assad’s forces. France has also said its own tests of samples from inside Syria proved Assad’s forces have used the nerve agent sarin.
Sellstrom is expected to deliver an interim report this month. U.N. envoys say it may just be oral and will likely be inconclusive since it is impossible for him to make definite pronouncements about the chain of custody of the samples he has received from Britain, France and the United States.
Syria is one of seven countries that has not joined the 1997 convention banning chemical weapons. Western nations believe it has caches of undeclared mustard gas, sarin and VX nerve agents.

New World Order Kills Democracy In Egypt

On Sunday, the Egyptian army and police slaughtered 51 unarmed, praying protestors.
The victims were part of a crowd praying outside the Republican National Guard headquarters in Cairo, where President Morsi (assuming he is still alive) is being held.
President Morsi is the first democratically-elected head of state in Egypt’s 5,000-year history. The way things are going, he could also be the last.
The army’s demolition of democracy, and its massacre of peaceful, unarmed protestors, seem likely to spark a civil war in Egypt. And civil wars do not end in democracy.
Why would Egypt’s fascist military leaders and the “deep state” they represent want civil war?
The Egyptian “deep state” consists of comprador billionaires and a corrupt military elite that lives on US aid. These people take orders from the global powers that be – the Bilderbergers, the Rothschilds, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, and their bought-and-paid-for politicians.
So if Egypt’s military has decided to massacre peaceful protestors at prayer, you can be sure that they are doing so as part of a larger strategy formulated by the globalists.
To understand that strategy, we must listen to the paid mouthpieces of the New World Order, and interpret their words.
Two of the New World Order’s biggest megaphones are the editorialists of The Wall Street Journal, and Thomas Friedman of The New York Times.
Last Friday, The Wall Street Journal ordered Egypt’s junta to follow in the footsteps of Pinochet’s Chile: “Egyptians would be lucky if their new ruling generals turn out to be in the mold of Chile’s Augusto Pinochet, who took over power amid chaos but hired free-market reformers and midwifed a transition to democracy.”
Pinochet was one of the worst butchers of the 20th century. After overthrowing and murdering democratically-elected President Allende in a CIA-sponsored coup on September 11th, 1971, Pinochet’s goons filled football stadiums full of people, tortured them, and massacred them.
So The Wall Street Journal wants Egypt’s junta to kill Morsi, just like Pinochet killed Allende, and employ widespread torture and mass murder. All in the name of “democracy.”
When the Egyptian junta decided to massacre the protestors outside Morsi’s prison, they were following the orders of the New World Order oligarchy – the people who own The Wall Street Journal and dictate its output.
Why do The Wall Street Journal’s owners want Egypt’s junta to massacre Muslim leaders and destroy political Islam in Egypt, in the same way that the CIA’s Pinochet massacred socialist leaders and destroyed socialism in Chile?
Let’s ask Thomas Friedman, the New World Order’s leading middlebrow mouthpiece.
In his August 2012 op-ed headlined “Morsi’s Wrong Turn,” Friedman attacked Morsi for attending the non-aligned summit in Tehran: “Excuse me, President Morsi, but there is only one reason the Iranian regime wants to hold the meeting in Tehran and have heads of state like you attend, and that is to signal to Iran’s people that the world approves of their country’s clerical leadership…Morsi’s first big trip shouldn’t have been to just China and Iran.”
Friedman’s diatribe was a New World Order warning to Morsi: Don’t try take Egypt out of the US-Israeli orbit! Don’t even think of joining the non-aligned movement! And don’t ever, EVER dream of creating a “clerical dictatorship,” meaning an Islamic society!
In the same op-ed, Friedman drew a line in the sand: Morsi had better support the Syrian rebels.
Another New World Order Mouthpiece, The Washington Post, viciously attacked Morsi for questioning the official story of 9/11. In an op-ed entitled “Getting Egypt’s Morsi to give up his 9/11 ‘truther’ talk” the Post wrote:
“Morsi has not been shy about airing his odious views. In a May 2010 interview with Brookings Institution scholar Shadi Hamid, Morsi dismissed al-Qaeda’s responsibility for the attacks. ‘When you come and tell me that the plane hit the tower like a knife in butter, then you are insulting us,’ Hamid reported Morsi as saying. ‘How did the plane cut through the steel like this? Something must have happened from the inside. It’s impossible.’ Similarly, in 2007, Morsi reportedly declared that the United States “has never presented any evidences [sic] on the identity of those who committed that incident.” In 2008, he called for a ‘huge scientific conference” to analyze “what caused the attack against a massive structure like the two towers.’”
Morsi, hearing so many warnings from the New World Order, apparently thought he could play both sides of the street: Defy the New World Order by working closely with Hamas and inching toward the non-aligned camp, while simultaneously taking money from the Saudis, Qataris and IMF, and offering at least verbal support to their mercenaries in Syria.
Morsi learned the hard way the truth of the old saying: “The only thing in the middle of the road is road kill.”
Now Thomas Friedman has published another New York Times op-ed laying bare the logic of the New World Order’s coup d’état in Egypt. It begins:
“Watching the toppling of the Muslim Brotherhood-led government in Egypt, the most interesting question for me is this: Will we one day look back at this moment as the beginning of the rollback of political Islam?”
That is what the West’s policy in the Islamic world – including the coup in Egypt – is all about: “The rollback of political Islam.”
Morsi, like the 9/11 Commission, was “set up to fail.” Now the Egyptian junta will try to do to political Islam in Egypt what Pinochet did to socialism in Chile.
But Islam is much more deeply-rooted than socialism. And no matter how hard the big Western think tanks try to dream up an apolitical Islam, no matter how many billions of dollars they throw at the problem, Islam remains “deen wa dowla” – not just a religion and a way of life, but a socio-political framework as well. And all the polls show that more than two-thirds of Muslims want a strict sharia-based society.
In Muslim-majority countries, democracy IS Islam.
If the New World Order wants to eradicate political Islam from Egypt, they cannot just kill a few tens of thousands of people like Pinochet did. They would have to massacre millions.
Not a very realistic plan.
The New World Order’s plan to roll back political Islam will itself be rolled back. The sooner Muslims overcome their differences and unite, the faster it will happen.

Dr. Kevin Barrett: Egypt's deniable coup: Another anti-Islam psy-op!

Luttwak's Coup d'Etat was the how to guide used by the perpetrators of 9/11, and the folks who just overthrew Morsi. American law bans any assistance to the government of any country whose duly elected head of government is deposed by military coup d'etat or decree. So what just happened in Egypt? Democratically elected Morsi was over-thrown and arrested by the military. The Constitution was suspended. Ruling party leaders were rounded up and imprisoned. The military seized TV and radio studios. But it wasn't a coup, the coup plotters insist. If they call it a coup, they will lose 1.5 billion dollars a year in US military aid, bribes to Egypt's junta to keep it subservient to Israel. Egypt's generals want to keep lapping up American money.They want to keep enslaving their country to IMF usury. They want to prevent their Muslim country from becoming a real Muslim country. And they want to keep kowtowing to Israel, and allowing the Palestinians to starve, while they arrest, torture, and kill Muslim activists. Egypt's coup that is not a coup is just the latest in a long line of covert coups, and those that don't. The latter are the topic of Edward Luttwak's 1969 book Coup d'Etat: A Practical Handbook. Luttwak shares with Paul Wolfowitz the dubious honor of being the world's leading neoconservative military strategist. His book Coup d'Etat is a how to guide for anyone who wants secretly, or at least deniably to overthrow a democratically-elected government. The key to a covert coup is good propaganda. If you can make enough people hate the democratically elected leader, it will be easy to overthrown him. and disguise the fact that a coup has occurred. By coincidence, I happened to be in Australia in 1974, just as the CIA was about yo overthrow democratically elected Prime Minister Geoff Whitlam in a covert coup d'etat. Here is how they did it. First, they used international banking institutions to strangle Australia's credit and damage its economy, just as the anti-Morsi coup plotters did in Egypt. Then they used domestic assets to further sabotage the economy.  Next, they used domestic assets to further sabotage the economy. So did the anti-Morsi coup plotters. Next, they used their control of the media to generate an endless barrage of anti-Whitlam propaganda, just as the Egyptian plotters used the controlled Egyptian media to crank out anti-Morsi propaganda. With the economy destroyed, and the targeted leader smeared by the media, it was easy to overthrow the elected leader and pretend that it was the will the will of the people. The CIA's overthrow of Geoff Whitlam in 1974 was designed to prevent     

Roi Tov: Shocking Revelations on Muhammad al Durah Assassination!

The Assassination pf 12c year old Muhammad al Durah in the Netzarim Junction. Gaza Strip, on September 30, 2000, refuses to die.Even if not remembering the boy's name, no human heart will forget the images of the terrified boy hiding behind his father in a futile attempt to avoid the flying bullets. Second later, the boy is seen slumped across his father's legs. Nonviolent Resistance in the Second Intifada. Filmed by Talal Abu Rahma, the event was reported by Charles Enderlin of France 2 Channel, and reached worldwide resonance, becoming a key event of the Second Intifada. On June26, 2013, a judicial process related to the event reached its end in France. Today, July 9, Israeli Settler Channel 7, revealed shocking facts suppressed until now by the Israeli Administration.Jamal and Muhammad al Durrah. Nonviolent Resistance in the Second Intifada. Paris Court of Appeals Rules. The case wouldn't have survived 13 years without a judicial process keeping its fire alive. As often happens, the lawsuit was unrelated to the dead boy and his family. It was even conducted on a different continent. Philippe Karsenty, a deputy mayor of Neuilly sur Seine, who runs media watchdog Media Ratings, wrote on November 26, 2004 that the shooting scene had been faked by the cameraman, claiming that Muhammad had not been killed and that Enderlin and Chabot, France 2's news editor, should be sacked. The complex judicial saga that followed ended a few days ago. Karsenty was convinced of defamation and fined $ 7,000 by the Paris Court of Appeals. Reporter Charles Enderlin was born in France. A Jew, he got Israeli citizenship under the Law of Return and worked as Channel 2 reporter in Israel. Phlippe Karsenty is also Jewish. We was portrayed by Settler Chanel 2 reporter in Israel. Philippe Karsenty is also Jewish. He was portrayed by Settler Channel 7 as willing to help the IDF.In 2001, Israeli military officials stopped cameraman Talal Abu Rahma from traveling to London in order to receive the Rory Peck Award. They claimed this was due to concern for his life, this is an extraordinarily odd claim. Problematic Broadcast: Reaching court was probably expected by Chanel 2. After all, their one minute video broadcast had been heavily edited, and in a way that the fact could not been hidden. This can be understood, broadcasting the agony of the boy's last moments would have been violating his life for a second time. However, certain facts were concealed also by the IDF, which played an odd role in the entire affair. 

Allen L. Roland: Too Low and too Slow, SF Commercal Plane Crash!

As a former Navy carrier pilot, I am acutely aware of the importance of the thrust, power and drag curve when landing. It appears, as the enclosed videos indicate, that the pilots realized too late that the commercial aircraft was too low and too slow to add power and gain altitude before the recent tragic tragic crash at SF International airport. Having landed commercially at SF Airport countless times over the years, there is a few minute approach to the airport over water before landing which always reminds me of landing on the carrier as a Navy interceptor carrier pilot in the early 1960's. As a Navy pilot, with over 150 all weather landings, I was constantly aware of the thrust, power and drag curve as I maneuvered the plane for a landing on the carrier, always aware that if I got too low and too slow, the bottom would fall out of my ability to gain altitude by adding power, drag would prevail and the plane would stall and fall like a rock. This is apparently what happened at SF International a few days ago seconds before the commercial aircraft struck the ground as the enclosed video clearly shows and the cockpit recorder apparently indicates. The crash survivor comments also indicate that the aircraft was too low and too slow to gain precious altitude and overcome drag in the last few seconds before the crash. Voice recorder reveals that seven seconds before the plane hit into a seawall, one of the crew members called on the pilots to increase speed. Information from the flight data recorder said the plane was going well below the target landing speed, and the engine throttles advanced. Four seconds before impact, a stick shaker, a device that emits an oral and physical warning to the crew that the plane is about to stall, sounded off, NTSB Chairman Deborah Hersman said, You can well imagine the panic of the flight crew when the application of full power had no effect on aktitude, for they had apparently passed the bottom of the thrust, power and drag curve and they stalled before crashing. Read more information on accident: Here is an eyewitness report and video of the actual crash, and a strong indication that the pilot was probably too low and too slow and vainly tried to abort the landing.  And here crash survivor Eugene Rah comments on the last few moments of the flight, and his awareness that the aircraft was too low and too slow, and how he braced himself before the crash. Flying is hours and hours of sheer boredom punctuated by seconds of stark terror. Ernest Gann, Fate Is The Hunter. About the Author: L Roland is a Freelance Alternative Press Online columnist. He is also a practicing psychotherapist, author and lecturer who also guests hosts a Truthtalk, a national radio show that airs monthly. He is available for comments, interviews, speaking engagements and private consultations via email at allen@allenroland.com.    

By John V. McDermott for Veterans Today: Detroit 9/11 Terror!

Has the Metropolitan Detroit area demonstrated any greater connection to domestic terrorism events and developments? Have any of those same domestic events been so-called False Flag events intended to mislead public opinion by falsely implicating people who were not wholly responsible for the events? Are there any demonstrable relationships between or among those persons from Metropolitan Detroit who have figured prominently in these terrorism related events? Were Carl Levin and Arthur Radford Baker in communication between March 2001 and September 11, 2001? Did Carl Levin receive information about the Gomel Chesed Cemetary informant from Arthur Radford Baker? Did Arthur Radford Baker receive instructions from Carl Levin to reject or discourage the Gomel Chesed informant? Why would the FBI assign a Congressional Affairs Liaison to respond to an informant from Newark, alleging a terrorism threat? Were Carl Levin and Arthur Radford Baker in communication between March 2001 and September, 11, 2001? Did Carl Levin receive information about the Gomel Chesed informant? Why would the FBI assign a Congressional Affairs Liaison to respond to an informant from Newark alleging a terrorism threat? Was Baker assigned to the Gomel Chesed matter by the Administration's transitional FBI hierarchy or by the fiat of Carl Levin? Why did Carl Levin seemingly interrupt the questioning of Richard Myers by another Senator on September 13, 2001? Was there some collusion between Levin and Myers regarding Myers' confirmation? Was there some collusion between Levin Myers regarding Myers' confirmation? Was there come collusion between Levin and Myers regarding the apparent NORAD stand down on September 11, 2001? Was Myers' confirmation as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff a quid pro-quo promised by Levin or others for Myers standing down NORAD on 9/11? Was Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin one of the principal planners of the 9/11 attacks? Michigan native Terry Nichols is a convicted accomplice in the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing which claimed the lives of 168 people. Nichols met his future co-conspirator Tim McVeigh during as brief stint in the US Army. In 1994 and 1995, Nichols and McVeigh practiced ammonium nitrate bomb making at or near a Nichols' family property in eastern Michigan's Thumb region. No fewer than 24 witnesses saw Timothy McVeigh, just before and after the explosion, with a man who could not have been either Terry Nichols or convicted accomplice Michael Fortier. The FBI refused to release the many security camera videos from nearby properties which would have captured images of this other unidentified suspect.

Veterans Today: Stressing The Point: When is a PTSD Claim Legitimate, and When Is It Not?

Expanded version of an article first published in the November 1995 issue of For the Defense, the monthly journal of the Defense Research Institute, Chicago, Illinois. Partial Reprint of a 1996 article on PTSD. Stressing the Point: When is a Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Claim Legitimate, and When Is It Not. PTSD is a condition that arises from exposure to life thraetening circumstances and it was first diagnosed among some of the survivors of wartime combat. Throughout W.W.I the syndrome was known as Shell Shock and was thought to be primarily motivated by the soldier's effort at self preservation. In World War II it was called War Neurosis or Combat Fatigue. The modern diagnosis of PTSD, a by-product of the Vietnam War, falls within the general DSM-IV category of Anxiety Disorders, sub category of Stress Disorders. Listed below are the DSM-IV's diagnostic criteria for PTSD, followed by my detailed discussion  of these criteria. Like pregnancy, PTSD is defined as something one has or does not have: for medical legal purposes, there are no shades of PTSD gray, even though in actuality and in some current research, the condition is viewed more in terms of a gradient of symptoms. Medical-legally, however, one is either in or out of the diagnosis, according to whether or not the individual fulfills the six specific, detailed criteria, the so-called A-F criteria. In a nutshell, the A criter ia require an individual to have been exposed to a life-threatening circumstance. Earlier incarnations of the DSM used a broad and overly inclusive yardstick, outside of the range of normal human experience, but this criterion was considered too loose and was easily abused in its interpretation. With the recent publication of DSM-IV, the "A" criteria have been tightened considerably. The new wording requires that the person experienced, witnessed or was confronted with an event or events that involved actual or threatened death. Even the secondary phrase, or serious injury, or a threat to the physical integrity of self or others implies a grave degree of bodily threat. It was the intention of the DSM-IV subcommittee to tighten the "A"criteria so that it conformed more closely to the kind of actual life-threatening circumstances, such as combat, where PTSD was first observed. In essence, the trauma must be sufficiently severe that it ruptures a person's bubble of invulnerability. Most of the time people avoid thinking about the possibility of death in order to carry on their daily lives without constant, high levels of anxiety. PTSD victims re-experience the trauma over and over again, in a variety of different ways. This results from the psyche's effort to master overwhelming perceptual stimuli.

Veterans Today: Guess Who Killed America? Hal Lindsey!

Say it Isn't So? Hal Lindsey Killed America. Yukon Jack for Veterans Today. Hal Lindsey is more powerful than most realize, I like Hal Lindsey, bit being a truth teller I have to say, he killed America. Say it's not so, you say! Let me explain why Hal Lindsey steered the US Titanic straight into the Zionist iceberg, and now America is sinking fast, glug, glug. glug, she's keeled over just about ready to go under. How influential was this man? He is considered the most influential of all Christian Zionists of the 20th century. Hal Lindsey single-handedly killed America because he delivered tens of millions of Christians into the pro-Zionist, pro-Neocon fold. Satan, himself, could not have done a better job. Hal Lindsey is one of the world's greatest charismatic Evangelical crusaders, his success led to a ruination of America, he converted and delivered millions of believers and molded them into a right wing Christian Zionist grass roots political movement. No man did a better job recruiting loyalists for Zionist Israel and prepping conservative Christians for the upcoming Neocon future. The cumulation of this Evangelical fervor was the election of GW Bush, 911, and support the terror war. In my opinion, this relationship is powerful evidence that Evangelicals still buy the official version of 911 and support the terror war. In my opinion, this relationship is powerful evidence that Evangelical thought energy was causal. They can't see what they are doing, because they are under their own spell. No matter what Israel does it must be okay, because Israel can do no wrong, including 911. Don't get me wrong, I like Hal Lindsey, well sort of, I wouldn't mind to debate him about his beliefs. We are both very personable people. But what I believe about his beliefs makes him the devil incarnate. In fact I've watched this whole drama unfold for four decades, ever since I was handed a copy of The Late Great Planet Earth in the early Seventies on a university campus by a group called Campus Crusade for Christ, the world's largest interdenominational Christian organization. Hal Lindsey's eschatological view of America's immediate future convinced many about the approaching and impending doom, a very real feeling probably caused the assassination of President Kennedy, the endless and irrational Vietnam war, aggressive social engineering, i.e feminism, inflationary policies of the Federal Reserve, profligate Federal spending of the 1970's just to name a few. Hal Lindsey's genius was to put a spin on those collective feelings and make them Biblical. Armageddon was just around the corner and in a sense he war right, America was going to hell, but not for the reasons he thought, it was heading straight into to Zionist hell where it currently smolders.

Roi Tov: Columnist: Gzerot Ramadan!

Love thy neigh-bour as thyself, Leviticus 19: 18. Few languages are better equipped than Hebrew to deal with pain and institutional abuse. It differentiates between a regular scream and a painful one, creating a linguistic paradise for torturers. It even has a special word for unjustified collective punishment, the result of the people's need to deal linguistically with the intrinsic injustice of their despotic leaders. In July 2013, the Zionist leadership imposed the plural of gzera on its Palestinian population ahead of Ramadan. Israel and Ramadan. Since the 1967 War, Israel became the military ruler of Jerusalem, including what is colloquially called The Old City, though it is not exactly old. Two millennia of debris had changed the landscape of Jerusalem. Old City is the name of the area enclosed by an Ottoman Empire Wall, which by local standards cannot be considered truly old. It is not even middle aged, it was built in 1538 by local standards cannot be considered truly old, it is not even middle aged, it was built in 1538 by Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent. Biblical Golgotha is within its walls, within them everything is flat, to the extent that it is difficult to imagine the Via Dolarosa as the steep way Jesus walked to His crucifixion. In 1980, Israel formally annexed the Old City in a step condemned worldwide. Until 1980, Israel formally annexed the Old City in a step condemned worldwide. Until 1967, this newish Old City was divided in six parts. The Armenian, Christian, Jewish, Moroccan and Muslim Quarters were all dwarfed by the Temple Mount, Haram Al Sharif in Arabic, Har HaBait in Hebrew. The Dome of the Rock on it dates back to the 7th Century, to the Umayyad Caliphate, and is one of the oldest surviving structures in the city. Following the 1967 War, the Moroccan Quarter,, which was located in front of the Western Wall, the largest reminder of the Jewish Second Temple, was removed by the IDF in order to create the large esplanade existing nowadays in front of the Wall. The remaining area of this quarter was annexed to the Jewish Quarter. The religious, ethnic definition of the quarters is true historically, but not enforced by the different civilian authorities that controlled the area in recent centuries, all the quarters had mixed populations. Showing how weak the Israeli presence in the area is, the Old City was inscribed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site only in 1981, by a petition of Jordan. Similarly, Bethlehem's Nativity Church was awarded the status by petition of Jordan. Similarly, Bethlehem's Nativity Church was awarded the status by a petition made by Palestine. This is due to a simple fact, once the site is registered as a World Heritage Site, it must be restored and faithfully kept.

Dean Henderson: Banking On War!

On 3-19 sum of numbers equals 13, 2003 at 9:31, sum of numbers equals 13 PM EST in the 3rd week of the third year of the new millennium, the Illuminati oil mafia attacked Iraq under the banner of Operation Iraqi Freedom. The assault was conducted by US and British troops, with the Israelis receiving real time intelligence throughout the war. When Bush appeared on national television, he appeared before a black flag bearing an eagle clutching 13 arrows, representing the Hapsburg Spear of Destiny. Spain, whose monarch Prince is a Habsburg, joined the coalition of the willingfor the assault. The first task of the invading troops was to encircle the massive Rumaila oilfields in the south. Soon the northern Kirkuk oilfields were also secured. For all the pre-war talk of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction none were found. In May 2003, a group of former intelligence officials accused the Bush Administration of cooking intelligence data concerning weapons of mass destruction. The nine member Pentagon Office of Special Plans charged with skewing the intelligence was known as The Cabal. A brainchild of Zionist Undersecretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, The Cabal essentially supplanted the CIA in providing edited intelligence to the Bush White House. It's nine members were disciples of University of Chicago political science professor Leo Strauss, who was dissertation adviser to Wolfowitz and who once wrote, that the works of ancient philosophers contain deliberately
concealed esoteric meanings whose truths can be comprehended only by a few. This alerts one to the possibility that political life may be closely linked to deception. Invading Iraq had nothing to do with Saddam or WMD. As one Bush Administration official put it, After WWII, we thought strategically about what were the key industrial areas of Europe that need to be under Western control. If you start thinking about the Middle East in the same way, Iraq jumps to the front, because it is that nexus of oil, education, geography. Bush Administration NSA Senior Director for Near East and North Africa, Elliot Abrams, earlier point man in Reagan's contra effort, authored a proposal in December 2002, which called for US control of Iraqi oil after Saddam's ouster. Assistant Secretary of State Kim Holmes commissioned a proposal for the privatization of Iraq's economy, including the Iraqi National Oil Company. The study's authors Ariel Cohen and Gerald O'Driscoll concluded that the Process should include a massive, orderly and transparent privatization of the oil sector. As energy expert Paul Michael Whibey, formerly with the influential Israeli think tank Institute for Advanced Studies put it, In Post Saddam Iraq, I think we will see very significant additional volumes from Iraq.   

Gordon Duff: Game Over for Morsi, Israel!

Morsi's rule was a game, little more, in fact, no more than the selling of a totalitarian regime built on suppression of freedom of thought and expression and the careful grooming of extremism and slavish adherence to what had been intended to be a highly secretive plot, one so complex, so convoluted that discovery was impossible. Game over, is what the massive laser light show in Tahrir Square in Egypt's capital of Cairo is announcing to the cheering throngs. The sign is more right than some in Egypt, than all in the West, can begin to understand. Morsi's rule was a game, little more, in fact, no more than the selling of a totalitarian regime built on suppression of freedom of thought and the careful grooming of extremism and slavish adherence to what had been intended to be a highly secretive plot, one so complex, so convoluted that discovery was impossible. The great game, Morsi trying to buy Egypt's place on the table with the new Masters of the Universe, the coalition of Turkey's resurgent Ottoman dreams, rumored to exist only in Erdogan's diseased brain, Netanyahu's endless quest to prove to mankind that depravity knows no bounds, but we only begin. It goes much further, much deeper, layer upon layer, a grand design clearly intended to end all human moral considerations, replacing them with a new relativism , all thinly veiled hucksterism peddled by half baked carnival con-men. The con, selling The Clash of Civilizations as a cover and deception plan, covering the truth, deceiving any seeking enlightenment, meant to obscure the simple reality that a group of secret societies, some many centuries old, men serving an unseen master best described as Satanic, believe they have been chosen to oversee the end of humanity. Insane as it sounds, the list of those seeking membership is endless. I don't really think this is much of a secret anymore. No rational person could believe otherwise as we are drowning, in some cases literally, in evidence. Only a fool would fail to see the patterns. Calling them predators is too generous. Our elites are more akin to a nasty strain of syphilis. You know the names, Morsi was simply trying to get on the list. Let's be honest, I don't Morsi really made it. Well, with Game Over, one thing is for sure, the people of Egypt and their army weren't as easily fooled as the American people after 9/11. Most agree that the turning point for the army was Morsi's call for war against Syria. Those still harboring illusions as to Morsi, excusing his behavior as unbalanced or insane, simply weren't paying attention. The American media had no trouble either, saw no inconsistencies in his betrayal of the Palestinians, his systematic sabotage of Egypt's economy, his curious political alignments, neocons in America, Likudists in Israel and Al Qaeda in Syria. Americans have gained a delightful moral flexibility, an ability to rationalize, to betray, to deceive and be deceived and they seem to love it!   

Dr. Kevin Barrett: Israel Curse of the Jews!

In the whole sordid history of human radiation experiments, none were more horrific than the murder, and crippling of more than 100,000 Sephardic Jewish children by the state of Israel in cooperation with the US. Less than a year ago, Barry Chamish, one of several Zionists I can't help admiring, admitted that Christopher Bollyn was right, Israel was behind 9/11. I like people who don't let a good ideology blind them to the truth. In this essay, Barry takes another step toward noticing the elephant in the living room: Zionism is the product of monsters, and the wealthy monsters behind it will undoubtedly save themselves, and let the poor suckers perish, when the whole thing goes up in flames. In mid June, 2013, the Israeli President Shimon Peres, threw himself a lavish tax-payer funded birthday bash. In the midst of the festivities, the Rabbi he effectively murdered, Uzi Meshulum, passed away. To him I say, Zichron L' Brecha, Rest In Peace. For a time, I knew him quite well: In 1995, my revelations about the Rabin murder made headlines in Israel and the leaders of the Yemenite Children's movement asked me to investigate their cause. Their movement's leader, Rabbi Uzi Meshulum was arrested and they feared for his life. Who could blame them? Meshulum's arrest had already caused one murder. To get the rabbi into prison, the Israeli authorities surrounded his home and placed him and several dozen of his congregants under siege. Nearly 2000 police and Shabak officers arrived at his home in Yehud and they were backed up by helicopters and dogs. But it was the snipers who were assigned to wipe out the rabbi, his family and his congregation. One unarmed congregant, Shlomi Asoulin was shot by a sniper. He was taken to police lines, where he was allowed to bleed to death. Then Rabbi Meshulum's house was shot up. I counted fifty bullet holes
in his living room walls and then stopped. I got the message. The state tried to mass execute him, his wife, children and young followers. In 1996, Rabbi Meshulum asked to meet me. I traveled with his wife to Sharon Prison, walked through a maze of sinking corridors until I reached his compound. We shook hands, and he had a powerful grip. We spoke of many things but I wanted to know the big truth from the source: why hadn't he united the kidnapped children with their biological parents? He then blasted the music on his portable tape machine and explained that he didn't have the heart to tell the parents that majority of their children were dead, murdered in atomic experiments, most shipped first to America in cages. Then he revealed the reason for his repression: the founder of the Israeli atomic research program was Shimon Peres, and if the truth came out, he would be exposed for his role in the atrocities.     

Preston James PhD: Secret Space War III: Marduk Lands in Africa?

Occasionally a good rumor is entertaining as well as distracting from the often negative barrage of daily world news which is usually slanted to indicate the demise of populism which is far from true. This article involves a story which I certainly hope turns out to be just a funny rumor. The problem is that the source for this story has very deep Intel connections and usually is right on the money. And there are certain background details which create many more questions which seem quite remarkable in scope. A very strange trip to Africa during the last week of June 2013 for the last three American Presidents. In the June 18, 2013 issue of the Africa Review in Kenya, Africa, a very interesting story detailed expected intersecting visits of both former President Clinton and current President Obama to Senegal, Africa. The topic alone has not received any suitable explanation other than the flimsy reason that they were there to commemorate the Al Cia Duh bombing at the US Embassy in Tanzania. And I believe it or not former President George W. Bush is alleged to also have arrived in Africa during this time period. Former US President Bill Clinton is expected in Senegal hours before the arrival of the incumbent President Barack Obama, sources said. The leading Le Populair daily on Tuesday quoted American embassy sources hinting that the two statesmen could likely meet during their stay in Dakar. The sources further said that President Obama was expected to extend his visit initially billed for 48 hours to 72 hours, beginning June 26. Several sitting world leaders, including, former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan and the late Pope Jean Paul II, have visited Senegal over the last decade and toured the famous slave dungeon on Goree Island. This visit of three American Presidents to the continent of Africa during the same time period is unprecedented in history and would appear to require an extraordinary explanation which has not been forthcoming. As if this story wasn't already strange enough, it gets even stranger, a story in CNN Politics on June 22, 2013 stated that President Obama and former President George Bush were to be on the African continent at the same time. Obama flies Wednesday across the Atlantic for a trip that takes him to Senegal, South Africa and Tanzania, marking his second visit to sub Saharan Africa as president. He went to Ghana during his first term. Meanwhile Bush, who's made multiple visits to Africa since leaving office, leaves next week for Zambia, where he is working with his global health initiative to renovate a clinic
that will serve as a cervical cancer screening and treatment center, according to the George W. Bush Presidential Center. While the 44th and 43rd president are not scheduled to meet up, first lady Michelle Obama will attend an event hosted in part by former first lady Laura Bush. The two will attend the African First Ladies Summit, put on by the George W. Bush Institute, in Tanzania on July 2, the final day of the Obamas' trip.