Joshua Holland: The Conservative Psyche!

How ordinary people come to embrace Paul Ryan's Cruelty. Earlier this year, Democratic operatives looking for the best way to define Mitt Romney discovered something interesting about Paul Ryan's budget. The New York Times reported that when the details of his proposals were run past focus groups, they found that the plan is so cruel that voters "simply refused to believe any politician would do such a thing." In addition to phasing out the Earned Income Tax Credit that keeps millions of American families above the poverty line, and cutting funding for children's health care in half, Jonathan Cohn described the "America that Paul Ryon envisions" like this: Many millions of working age Americans would lose health insurance. Senior citizens would anguish over whether to pay their rent or their medical bills, in a way they haven't since the 1960s. Government would be so starved of resources that, by 2050, it wouldn't have enough money for core functions like food inspections and highway maintenance. Ryan's "road-map" may be the least serious budget plan ever to emerge in Washington, but it is reflective of how far to the right the GOP has moved in recent years. According to a recent study of public attitudes conducted by the Pew Research Center, in 1987, 62 percent of Republicans said "the government should take care of people who cannot take care of themselves," but that number has now dropped to just 40 percent. That attitude was on display during a GOP primary debate last fall, when moderator Wolf Blitzer asked Ron Paul what fate should befall a healthy person without health insurance, who finds himself suddenly facing a catastrophic illness. "Congressman," Blitzer pressed after Paul sidestepped the question, "are you saying that society should just let him die?" Before Paul had a chance to respond, the audience erupted in cheers, with some shouting, "yeah!"