J.B. Gerald: On Psywar Against the Innocent!

When freedom of expression is used to incite the public to hatred of a national, religious, racial or ethnic group, it becomes a crime. According to Article 20 of the UN's International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: 1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law. 2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law. This doesn't contradict rights of freedom of expression. It attempts to constrain agendas of hatred. It is possible that any program of military propaganda or psywar against groups or nations is fundamentally illegal. Attempts to defend extreme hate crimes as within our rights of free speech encourages censorship, which encourages repression. A video of US origin, "Innocence of Muslims," the trailer to a film defaming and sexually deriding the Prophet Mohammed, has of course resulted in protest by Muslims worldwide. Why isn't everyone protesting? The trailer is intensively offensive to human values, lacks redeeming artistic merit, and is recognizably propaganda. In California, a judge refused to ban "Innocence of Muslims" from you tube, on the grounds that suppression would violate US guarantees of free speech. In France Charlie Hebdo has published on its cover a cartoon caricature depicting Islam's Prophet naked in a distorted sexual posture. The effect is despicable and intended. The original issue sold out, and despite the anxiety of the country's 4 million Muslims, Charlie Hebdo ran the cartoon again. While France is sensitive to religious laws - abortions don't appear in French literature, it hasn't charged the editors of Charlie Hebdo with a hate crime, and instead closed French embassies and schools in twenty countries.