Robert Fisk: Syria, Bashar al-Assad, and the Truth about Chemical Weapons!

Bashar's father Hafez al Assad was brutal, but never used chemical weapons. Do you know which was the first army to use gas in the Middle East? The bigger the lie, the more people will believe it. We all know who said that, but it still works. Bashar al Assad has chemical weapons. He may use them against his own Syrian people. If he does, the West will respond. We heard all this stuff last year, and Assad's regime repeatedly said that if, if it had chemical weapons, it would never use them against Syrians, but now Washington is playing the same gas chanty all over again. Bashar has chemical weapons. He may use them against his own people. And if he does, well if he does, Obama and Madame Clinton and NATO will be very, very angry, but over the past week, all the usual pseudo experts who couldn't find Syria on a map, having been warning us again of the mustard gas, chemical agents, biological agents that Syria might possess, and might use.  And the sources? The same fantasy specialists who didn't warn us about 9/11, but insisted that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction in 2003: "unnamed military intelligence sources". Henceforth to be acronymed as UMIS. And now, the coup de theatre. Someone from the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation called me up this week to talk about the use of chemical weapons by Hafez al Assad in Hama during the Sunni Muslim uprising in the city in 1982. Their sources were the same old UMIS, but it happened to have got into Hama in February 1982, which is why the Canadian was calling me, and while Hafez's Syrian army was very definitely slaughtering its own people, who were, by the way, slaughtering regime officials and their families. No one ever used chemical weapons. Not a single soldier I saw in Hama carried a gas mask. No civilians carried gas masks. The dangerously perfumed air which I and my colleagues smelled after chemicals were used by our ally Saddam against Iranian soldiers in the 1980's was not present.